![]() ![]() Since the late 1990s, several authors have conducted research on a number of aspects that can be categorized as follows: the characteristics of the OSC ( Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998 Tsai & Ghoshal, 1998 Leana & Pil, 2006) its determinants ( Leana & Van Buren, 1999 Cohen & Prusak, 2001 Adler & Kwon, 2002 Bolino et al., 2002. The authors consider that OSC is part of the organizational skills that can become distinctive and can generate value. This theory includes various approaches ( Eisenhardt & Santos, 2002 Acedo, Barroso & Galan, 2006 Desreumaux, Lecocq & Warnier, 2009), however, it can be said that it emphasizes on the strength of internal resources and competencies of an organization to promote and guide the definition of durable competitive advantages. Among the various existing theories in strategy, the authors adhere to the theory of competitiveness based on resources ( Penrose, 1995, Wernerfelt, 1984, Barney, 1991, Amit & Schoemaker, 1993). The interest of the authors is in strategy, specifically on choosing, building or obtaining sustainable competitive advantages. In this paper, the formation of Organizational Social Capital (OSC) in the Technology-based Micro Enterprises (TBME) is analyzed from the identification, characterization and illustration of a set of determining variables and signals called of opportunity. ![]() Second, a set of signals of opportunity allowed to identify the presence and characterize the role of six key variables (relational competence, commitment, work environment, complementarity of roles, opportunities for communication and strategic orientation) in the formation of OSC. Five case studies of a technology-based small enterprise (TBSE) and four Technology-based Micro Enterprises (TBME) were performed to answer the main research question: How to operationalize the concept of OSC to understand and manage it more effectively? From the empirical phase, the following results were obtained: first, an analysis model for the formation of OSC that graphically presents the adoption of a multilevel analysis (individual, team and organizational). ![]() For example, in Kazakh the word "train" is taken from Russian (poezd), but then this word is treated and changed as Kazakh.In this paper, organizational social capital (OSC) is conceived as a particular organizational competency determined by the convergence of three relational assets (orientation towards collective goals, mutual trust and shared values), which allows organizations that have it, to coordinate and cooperate for mutual benefit and increased performance. In this case very interesting so-called "new" or "unscientific" languages. Those, language change terminology by its own rules. in English or atom, atomy, atomnyi in Russian). These words, even calqued ones, vary according to the laws of a particular language (atom, atoms, atomic etc. telo) is a word from the general thesaurus of Russian, just like in English, while German are used Latin origin word " Körper" (corporis). There are many such examples in Russian: the word " atom" (Rus. The term can be either “calque” of other language more developed in a scientific or technical sense, or a word from a national vocabulary adapted for professional use. The term does not exist by itself, it is included in the thesaurus of a specific field of human activity, and this thesaurus is a subset of a particular language. I agree with many participants, but everyone ignores, in my opinion, an essential feature of the term, its connection with national language. I will try to concentrate on the word "term". The proposed question suggests an answer in the form of a monograph, at a minimum, but I will not write it -/). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |